Trash Dispatch: Blogger witnesses Polls being manipulated by ABC News.
"Wow, talk about some shady “journalism.” Earlier today ABC News posted a poll asking who won the democratic debate and Kucinich won by over 3,000 votes. Just recently they reposted the poll to bury the previous one and cut his picture out on top of that! What the hell?? Just pathetic." writes intoinsanity.com.
Apparently, an "early" ABC News Poll, showed Democratic Ohio Congressman "Dennis Kucinich" as the Clear Winner of the Iowa Democratic Debate. But ABC News didn't like that result, so they discarded the ealier poll, and began a New Poll only this time, they "Cut" Democratic Ohio Congressman "Dennis Kucinich" out of the picture (as shown below).
The Trash Dispatch, reported on it's own findings in the Iowa democratic Debate, and of it's impression of Democratic Ohio Congressman Dennis Kucinich, "HERE".
And while the findings of the Trash Dispatch do not coincide with sentiment of the democratic voters, they are nevertheless a clue as to how a candidate such as Ohio Congressman Dennis Kucinich, - so Low on the Totem Pole - could possibly have won the favoritism of the voters as the congressman's Raise to Popularity, is a phenomenon that has been "seen before" in previous elections, with other "Underdog type candidates", such as, "Ross Perot".
{Trash Note: "They even Look Alike!"}
[Links]
2 comments:
There was actually a third poll preceding the debate titled "Who will win the democratic debate." Mike Gravel was in the top three on that poll before it disappeared.
The top-tier is a myth, perpetuated by a media feedback loop and manipulated polling. Have you or any of your friends, family, or coworkers ever been polled by the media on an election? Ask around, ask anybody! Who are they polling?
It's all a lie. Welcome to the matrix. You get out by voting in a rebel like Mike Gravel, Dennis Kucinich, or Ron Paul. Someone not owned by the war machine.
You get out by voting in a rebel like Mike Gravel, Dennis Kucinich, or Ron Paul. Someone not owned by the war machine."
War machine. There was no war machine in The Matrix. There was, and is, only those who seek to control the whole human race as a Unified whole, rather than as a war torn populous. Anything less, constitutes failure, and necessitates the need for annihilation (deletion), and re-population (Restart).
Nevertheless, the rest of your supposition is also an error.
Remember the first Matrix? The people rejected it. And nonetheless, the citizens of the United States will reject such a Matrix. As in deed they rejected it on 9-11-01. When America was attacked, it was the populous, the Citizens of the United States, who Demanded "Blood for Blood", and NOT the establishment seeking "Blood for Oil" as was suggested by those who seek to control a "docile" populous, and not a war-like one.
Also, the third party movement itself was harmed during Ross Perot's run for the presidency when he withdrew from the race, then ran again, and then, well, needless to say, third party candidates now and since, are viewed with an overwhelming sense of distrust, and even uselessness.
And as far as Mike Gravel, Dennis Kucinich, and Ron Paul are concerned. They are nothing more than Ross Perot wannabes, and not good enough, to even be noticed by the general populous.
No, the trick, if there is one. Is not to elect someone who "promises" to do right, but to force the "Office of the President", to do that which is right, or face, Annihilation. In favor of a new Matrix, of course.
Note, the latter cannot be accomplished as long as there are term limits as "why" should a sitting president care, when there is no chance for his re-election, anyway?
Post a Comment